America's Test Kitchen LogoCook's Country LogoCook's Illustrated Logo

Reviews You Can Trust.
See Why.

The Best Copper Skillets

These beautiful, heat-responsive, pricey pans have a long history in fine cooking, but do they have a place in home kitchens today?

Headshot of Lisa McManus
By Lisa McManus

Last Updated June 24, 2025

What You Need To Know

We fully recommend most of the pans we tested. Which you choose depends on how you want to use it. For excellent heat transfer and remarkably even cooking, without any special maintenance, choose a multilayer pan with the copper mostly hidden away at the core. In this style, we love the All-Clad Copper Core 5-ply Bonded Cookware, Fry Pan, 12 inch. If you want to see plenty of copper on your skillet, don’t mind occasional polishing to maintain its luster, and can handle a heavier pan, go for the Mauviel M'Heritage M'200Ci Round Frying Pan, 11.9 In. Made of copper with a thin lining of stainless steel, it combines steel’s nonreactive, durable construction with copper’s responsiveness, so it cooked food evenly and adjusted quickly when we changed heat settings on the stove. Its generous cooking surface fit plenty of food without crowding, and its low, flaring sides helped evaporate steam, so food browned deeply. It’s also a beautiful piece of cookware.

our winning copper skillets by all-clad and mauviel
Julia Child's home kitchen always had plenty of copper cookware displayed on her famous pegboard wall.

Copper cookware has always been associated with fine cooking, from classic French restaurants to Julia Child, who famously displayed rows of the gleaming golden pans on her kitchen walls. Copper cookware has been used for thousands of years; copper pots have been excavated from Roman ruins, and copper plays a big part in American history. Today, with prices in the hundreds of dollars for a single skillet, what besides nostalgia and aesthetics does a copper skillet offer home cooks? We bought a variety of copper skillets and brought them into the test kitchen to find out. We also compared their performance with our favorite fully clad stainless-steel skillet.

Here are some things to know about copper skillets.

  • Speed: Copper is one of the fastest cookware materials for heat transfer, second only to silver. It’s more than 1.5 times as fast as aluminum and about 25 times faster than stainless steel. When placed on a burner, a copper skillet heats up very quickly, and when the flame is turned down, it cools fast, too. This responsiveness to the stove’s heat settings gives the cook excellent control and is what makes copper cookware a pleasure to use.
  • Beauty: Copper’s rich color speaks for itself.
  • Weight: Copper is dense, which makes it heavy. The copper skillets in our lineup averaged nearly twice the weight of our winning stainless-steel skillet. A closer comparison might be cast-iron pans.
  • Needs Polishing: Copper starts to look splotchy the minute you use it, and it will tarnish and darken over time (see “How can I polish tarnished copper pans?”).
This new copper skillet lost its perfect shine after only a few uses on a gas stove. Some cooks like the changing patina, which darkens over time. To keep its original appearance, copper needs to be polished.
  • Not Dishwasher-Safe: Harsh chemicals in dishwashing detergent will tarnish and wear away the copper.
  • Most Are Not Induction Compatible: Copper is not magnetic, so it won’t work on induction stoves. If this is important to you, we found a few models that include magnetic steel to make them compatible.
  • Reactivity: Copper is highly reactive to acids such as citrus, vinegar, and tomatoes and will leach into foods when in direct contact with them. Copper is poisonous when ingested in large quantities. That’s why copper cookware is almost always lined.
  • Lining Matters: For centuries, the only choice for lining copper cookware was tin, but in recent years, stainless steel has become common. A third option is to cover the copper entirely by making it the core layer of a multiclad pan. We bought some of each to compare (see “Can I cook in an unlined copper pan?”).
We placed each pan on a preheated burner and tracked its temperature with an infrared camera at three points (center, left, and right). A copper-core skillet (left) heated remarkably evenly across its surface, as did most steel-lined pans, because steel retains and spreads heat that copper transfers quickly into the pan. By comparison, a tin-lined pan (right) transferred heat vertically through the pan very quickly but heated less evenly across its surface.

What we learned: Once you line the copper pan with another metal, it changes how the pan transfers and retains heat, which affects cooking results. (Note: Copper pans can be lined with silver, which is highly durable and even faster than copper at transferring heat, but it is vastly more expensive. If price is no object, you can opt for solid silver cookware, but an 11.5-inch skillet costs $5,500.00. We did not test these.)

Copper transfers heat very quickly. A steel lining (left) helps hold and spread the heat throughout the pan. A tin lining (right) does not. As a result, steel-lined pans were less responsive but cooked more evenly. Tin-lined pans were super-responsive but cooked slightly less evenly.

What to Look For

When we made caramel sauce in each skillet, we admired how evenly they cooked across the pan surfaces. This is a steel-lined copper pan by Mauviel.
  • Steel-Lined Copper Skillets: Unlike tin linings, which are fragile (see “Tin Linings” below), stainless-steel linings are durable. However, stainless steel is 25 times slower to transfer heat than copper, and even a thin layer of steel puts the brakes on. Steel also retains heat, so steel-lined copper pans can’t cool as quickly when heat is lowered. Because this is a known drawback, this type of pan is usually marketed with descriptions of how thin manufacturers have made the steel layer, such as “90 percent copper, 10 percent steel.” However, we discovered that steel offers a benefit: As it slows copper’s quick vertical transfer of heat (up from the burner to the food), it forces heat to travel sideways through the copper, spreading rapidly across the cooking surface, making it cook more evenly and reducing hot spots.

OR look for:

  • Copper-Core Skillets: With copper in the center of a multiclad pan, you don’t have to worry about copper’s reactivity to acidic foods or copper maintenance. The pans in our lineup with copper cores sandwiched them between layers of aluminum and then steel, resulting in five-ply pans. Because aluminum also transfers heat rapidly, this combo gets a turbocharge in responsiveness. Adding a top and bottom layer of steel helps spread heat sideways through the pan and even allows the pan to be induction compatible. The pans we tested, which had a fairly thin, 1-millimeter copper layer at their core, cooked remarkably evenly. They were easy to maintain and were lighter and more maneuverable than pans made principally from copper. For sheer cooking performance, this is probably the best choice. The downside? With less exposed copper, they weren’t as beautiful.
  • Wide Cooking Surface: Our top-rated pans offered plenty of cooking space.

We made Three-Cheese Skillet Macaroni and Pan-Seared Chicken Breasts with Browned Butter Sauce in each skillet and preferred pans with wider, more spacious cooking surfaces. Narrow cooking surfaces crowded food and made us worry about spilling over the sides.

  • Low, Flared Sides: These make it easier to reach under food with a spatula and help moisture evaporate so that food browns more quickly.
  • Curved Corners: Sweeping a spatula around the pan without missing any food is easier with rounded rather than L-shaped sides.

Nice to Have

  • Steel Handles: Pans in our lineup had either stainless-steel or cast-iron handles. While cast-iron handles on copper are traditional and beautiful, steel handles are lighter and slower to heat up on the stovetop, minimizing the need for pot holders. That said, our two favorite pans had one of each type.
  • Induction Compatibility: If you have an induction stove, choose a copper-core pan with an outer layer of ferromagnetic steel.

What to Avoid

  • Tin Linings: In order to compare this traditional type of lining, we tested one tin-lined skillet, by House Copper, against the rest of the lineup. This deep, heavy, handmade pan is gorgeous, and would work well as a braising pan. The biggest issue about tin lining in a copper skillet? Tin melts at just 450 degrees, a temperature easily reached in a frying pan when there isn’t much liquid or food covering its surface. In order to protect the tin lining, we couldn’t prepare all the recipes we made in the other copper skillets in our lineup: Tasks such as toasting panko, searing chicken breasts, and finishing mac and cheese under the broiler were off-limits. Despite being very careful and constantly checking the surface temperature as we worked, we did damage the tin lining while browning butter. Copper pans can be re-tinned, so the damage is not permanent. But we would rather not have to worry so much about what should be a workhorse pan.
Our tin-lined pan was truly beautiful, but tin begins to melt and soften at 450 degrees. Even though we were careful, we damaged the lining when we browned butter in the pan. Searing and sautéing at high heat is not recommended in tin-lined pans.
  • Narrow Cooking Surfaces: We find that small cooking surfaces limit the capacity and versatility of a pan, and crowded food steams rather than browns.
  • High Sides: Tall sides discourage browning since they trap condensation, and they are awkward when reaching under food. 
  • L-Shaped Corners: This shape makes it harder to sweep a spatula around the skillet without leaving food behind. 

We preferred skillets with rounded interior corners (right) to L-shaped corners (left), where food can get trapped when you swipe a spatula around the pan.

  • So-Called “Copper” Nonstick Pans: Contrary to the way they are marketed, there are no copper skillets lined with nonstick coatings; these are aluminum or steel pans with copper-colored polytetrafluoroethylene or ceramic nonstick interiors and do not share any of the characteristics of real copper pans.

The Tests

How We Rated

  • Performance: We evaluated the skillets’ responsiveness to heat changes, the evenness of cooking and browning across their surfaces, their capacities, and their versatility. 
  • Ease of Use: We assessed factors such as shape, comfort, weight, and the balance of each skillet and handle.

FAQs

While we loved cooking in copper skillets, their performance only slightly outpaced that of the most similar style of skillet we already recommend: theAll-Clad D3 Stainless 12" Fry Pan with Lid, which cooks beautifully and is as tough as nails. (We’ve thermally shocked it and whacked it on a concrete block, and it just doesn’t care—we could not bring our inner frugal New Englander to do these abuse tests with copper pans costing up to $500 apiece.) The stainless-and-aluminum clad pan offered gorgeous, even browning; copper was slightly better. The All-Clad D3 is a fraction of the price of most of the skillets in this lineup, and it even comes with a lid. But we also fell in love with lustrous, heavy, serious copper skillets. The bottom line? We don’t need a copper skillet, but we want one.

Food is likely to stick in steel-lined copper skillets just as it does in stainless-steel clad ones. Unless you make sauce (i.e., to deglaze the pan), you may have to do a little soaking and scrubbing. To clean copper cookware after each use, here’s what we do in the test kitchen.

Routine Cleaning 

  • Use regular dish soap, water, and a soft cloth or sponge.
  • Don’t wash copper cookware in the dishwasher.
  • A little soaking will loosen stuck foods. Don’t use harsh, abrasive materials or cleansers to scrub the copper (such as the scrubby side of a kitchen sponge, steel wool, or wire brushes) because they can scratch the surface.
  • Stainless-steel interiors of lined copper pans can be scrubbed with abrasive materials or an acid-based powdered cleanser such as Bar Keepers Friend. 
  • Rinse and dry copper immediately after washing to help prevent tarnishing.

It can be a little shocking how fast copper’s appearance changes when you cook in it. Right away, the shiny, golden-red surface gets blotchy and streaky and the rich color fades to yellow; over time and with use, copper turns the deep brown of an old penny (for good reason: Pennies are copper plated, and until 1982 they were about 95 percent copper), or it can even turn green like the copper-plated Statue of Liberty. A patina is harmless, and some people like to leave it for a rustic look. If you want to restore your cookware to its original shiny copper glory, you can buy copper polish, but you also can use common pantry ingredients with excellent results. Here’s what to do: 

  1. Make a paste of equal parts fresh lemon juice (or white distilled vinegar) and table or kosher salt. Ketchup also works, but we found lemon juice most effective.
  2. Using a sponge (or the cut half of a lemon), rub the paste all over the copper, buffing until it’s shiny and no signs of tarnish remain.
  3. Rinse the pan with warm water, and dry it thoroughly.
  4. Admire your work.

In general, unlined copper cookware is unsafe to cook in, so if you see plain copper pans, they are purely for decorative purposes—except for a few special cases. Candymakers prize the precise temperature control they can get with unlined copper pots. Here, unlined pans are not unsafe because copper can only leach into food if there's sufficient water. When making candy, you typically do not want water present because you need to heat the sugar above the boiling point of water. Copper bowls also are coveted for whipping egg whites: Copper ions bond with the egg’s protein to make the foam extra-stable and long-lasting. 

That said, if you have a vintage copper pan with little to no lining, it was probably originally lined with tin that has worn away. A handful of coppersmiths around the country (such as House Copper and East Coast Tinning) still have the skills to re-tin cookware, so you’ll be able to cook in it safely once again. 

Most of the copper skillets we’ve tested are not induction compatible. Only ones made with ferromagnetic stainless steel can be used on an induction cooktop—you can tell whether they’re compatible by seeing if a magnet sticks to the bottom of the skillet. Our favorite induction-compatible copper skillet is the All-Clad Copper Core 5-ply Bonded Fry Pan, 12 inch. We’ve noted the induction compatibility of every model we tested in the chart below. We also have a guide to other induction-compatible cookware.

Everything We Tested

Good 3 Stars out of 3.
Fair 2 Stars out of 3.
Poor 1 Star out of 3.

Highly Recommended

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

Best Steel Lined SkilletMauviel M'Heritage 200 B Copper Frying Pan With Brass Handle, 11.8-In

We chose this beautiful, solidly made French steel-lined pan as our top pick for its roomy cooking surface and open, flared sides with rounded interior corners, all ideal in a classic skillet. It cooked responsively and well, giving us “perfect results” with caramel, nicely browned chicken with pan sauce, and bubbly mac and cheese. In our infrared tests, it heated exceptionally evenly across its surface. We found it a bit heavy to handle, like all the steel-lined copper pans in the lineup. Note: in 2024, Mauviel slightly redesigned this skillet with a brass rather than cast-iron handle, which tilts upward slightly more than the older handle; the pan itself has not changed.

Model Number: 681330

Style: Steel lined

Pan Thickness: 2.4 mm

Construction: Copper; 0.24-mm stainless-steel lining

Copper Layer Thickness: 2.16 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 9⅜ in

Handle: Cast iron

Induction Compatible: No

Weight: 4 lb, 8 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $435.00

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

We chose this beautiful, solidly made French steel-lined pan as our top pick for its roomy cooking surface and open, flared sides with rounded interior corners, all ideal in a classic skillet. It cooked responsively and well, giving us “perfect results” with caramel, nicely browned chicken with pan sauce, and bubbly mac and cheese. In our infrared tests, it heated exceptionally evenly across its surface. We found it a bit heavy to handle, like all the steel-lined copper pans in the lineup. Note: in 2024, Mauviel slightly redesigned this skillet with a brass rather than cast-iron handle, which tilts upward slightly more than the older handle; the pan itself has not changed.

Model Number: 681330

Style: Steel lined

Pan Thickness: 2.4 mm

Construction: Copper; 0.24-mm stainless-steel lining

Copper Layer Thickness: 2.16 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 9⅜ in

Handle: Cast iron

Induction Compatible: No

Weight: 4 lb, 8 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $435.00

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

Best Copper Core / Induction-Compatible SkilletAll-Clad Copper Core 5-ply Bonded Fry Pan, 12 Inch

Spacious, comparatively lightweight, and responsive, with remarkably even heating and excellent browning, this pan was a pleasure to cook in. It is five-ply, with a 1-millimeter core of copper, sandwiched first by layers of aluminum and then layers of stainless steel (a strip of the outer layers of aluminum and steel just above the base of the pan is cut away to display the copper core). Unlike most copper skillets, it’s induction compatible because the outermost layer of steel is ferromagnetic. It was the top performer in our infrared test of the evenness of its heat across its cooking surface. Minor quibbles: We sometimes sloshed ingredients over its extra-flared sides, but we appreciated that the open shape aided evaporation, helping food brown rather than steam. The helper handle became hot on the stovetop, but the stainless-steel main handle did not. Its cooking performance slightly outpaces its tri-ply sibling, the All-Clad D3 Stainless 12" Fry Pan with Lid, but it costs roughly twice as much.

Model Number: 6112 SS

Style: Copper core

Pan Thickness: 2.2 mm

Construction: 5-ply: copper core sandwiched by 2 layers of aluminum, then 2 layers of stainless steel

Copper Layer Thickness: 1 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 9¼ in

Handle: Stainless steel

Induction Compatible: Yes

Weight: 3 lb, 11 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $264.95

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

Spacious, comparatively lightweight, and responsive, with remarkably even heating and excellent browning, this pan was a pleasure to cook in. It is five-ply, with a 1-millimeter core of copper, sandwiched first by layers of aluminum and then layers of stainless steel (a strip of the outer layers of aluminum and steel just above the base of the pan is cut away to display the copper core). Unlike most copper skillets, it’s induction compatible because the outermost layer of steel is ferromagnetic. It was the top performer in our infrared test of the evenness of its heat across its cooking surface. Minor quibbles: We sometimes sloshed ingredients over its extra-flared sides, but we appreciated that the open shape aided evaporation, helping food brown rather than steam. The helper handle became hot on the stovetop, but the stainless-steel main handle did not. Its cooking performance slightly outpaces its tri-ply sibling, the All-Clad D3 Stainless 12" Fry Pan with Lid, but it costs roughly twice as much.

Model Number: 6112 SS

Style: Copper core

Pan Thickness: 2.2 mm

Construction: 5-ply: copper core sandwiched by 2 layers of aluminum, then 2 layers of stainless steel

Copper Layer Thickness: 1 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 9¼ in

Handle: Stainless steel

Induction Compatible: Yes

Weight: 3 lb, 11 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $264.95

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

Hestan Culinary CopperBond 11 Inch Skillet

A pretty skillet, this model felt surprisingly petite and lightweight compared with others in the lineup. We sometimes lost a few ingredients over the sides when stirring, and its cooking surface seemed slightly cramped, but every recipe we tested managed to fit, and the pan cooked evenly and responsively. It contains a single 1-millimeter layer of copper at its core, sandwiched between layers of aluminum and then steel on the top and bottom, with a strip of copper on the exterior sides as a visual reminder of its presence. Flat interior rivets made cleaning a bit easier. The exterior bottom layer of steel is induction compatible. The company also makes a 12.5-inch version, which is more expensive.

Model Number: 31590

Style: Copper core

Pan Thickness: 2.5 mm

Construction: 5-ply: copper core, sandwiched by 2 layers of aluminum, then 2 layers of stainless steel, plus additional copper on exterior sides

Copper Layer Thickness: 1 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 8½ in

Handle: Stainless steel

Induction Compatible: Yes

Weight: 3 lb, 3 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $219.95

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

A pretty skillet, this model felt surprisingly petite and lightweight compared with others in the lineup. We sometimes lost a few ingredients over the sides when stirring, and its cooking surface seemed slightly cramped, but every recipe we tested managed to fit, and the pan cooked evenly and responsively. It contains a single 1-millimeter layer of copper at its core, sandwiched between layers of aluminum and then steel on the top and bottom, with a strip of copper on the exterior sides as a visual reminder of its presence. Flat interior rivets made cleaning a bit easier. The exterior bottom layer of steel is induction compatible. The company also makes a 12.5-inch version, which is more expensive.

Model Number: 31590

Style: Copper core

Pan Thickness: 2.5 mm

Construction: 5-ply: copper core, sandwiched by 2 layers of aluminum, then 2 layers of stainless steel, plus additional copper on exterior sides

Copper Layer Thickness: 1 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 8½ in

Handle: Stainless steel

Induction Compatible: Yes

Weight: 3 lb, 3 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $219.95

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

Falk Culinair Classic Frying Pan, 28 cm (11 in)

This beautifully constructed pan heated evenly and browned exceptionally well. We loved its matte (the company calls it “satin”) surface inside and out, which made it easier to maintain than shiny surfaces on other pans. Its copper exterior also retained a deep reddish color, unlike other pans in the lineup whose patina became more faded and mottled with equivalent use. The pan’s squared rather than rounded edges made it a bit harder to sweep a spatula around it. Tiny handle rivets on the interior didn’t trap food residue and were easy to keep clean.

Model Number: INO2505SF

Style: Steel lined

Pan Thickness: 2.5 mm

Construction: Copper; 0.2-mm stainless-steel lining

Copper Layer Thickness: 2.3 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 9½ in

Handle: Cast iron

Induction Compatible: No

Weight: 5 lb, 10 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $309.00

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

This beautifully constructed pan heated evenly and browned exceptionally well. We loved its matte (the company calls it “satin”) surface inside and out, which made it easier to maintain than shiny surfaces on other pans. Its copper exterior also retained a deep reddish color, unlike other pans in the lineup whose patina became more faded and mottled with equivalent use. The pan’s squared rather than rounded edges made it a bit harder to sweep a spatula around it. Tiny handle rivets on the interior didn’t trap food residue and were easy to keep clean.

Model Number: INO2505SF

Style: Steel lined

Pan Thickness: 2.5 mm

Construction: Copper; 0.2-mm stainless-steel lining

Copper Layer Thickness: 2.3 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 9½ in

Handle: Cast iron

Induction Compatible: No

Weight: 5 lb, 10 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $309.00

Recommended

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

Matfer Bourgeat 11" Copper Frying Pan

Handsome, expensive, and roomy, this pan had the thickest copper layer and thinnest steel layer of the pans we tested. It was highly responsive and provided very uniform browning, and it had a large cooking surface. However, it also felt extra-heavy, making it awkward to maneuver.

Model Number: 369028

Style: Steel lined

Pan Thickness: 2.6 mm

Construction: Copper; 0.10-mm stainless-steel lining

Copper Layer Thickness: 2.5 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 9¼ in

Handle: Cast Iron

Induction Compatible: No

Weight: 5 lb, 15 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $409.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

Handsome, expensive, and roomy, this pan had the thickest copper layer and thinnest steel layer of the pans we tested. It was highly responsive and provided very uniform browning, and it had a large cooking surface. However, it also felt extra-heavy, making it awkward to maneuver.

Model Number: 369028

Style: Steel lined

Pan Thickness: 2.6 mm

Construction: Copper; 0.10-mm stainless-steel lining

Copper Layer Thickness: 2.5 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 9¼ in

Handle: Cast Iron

Induction Compatible: No

Weight: 5 lb, 15 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $409.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

de Buyer Inocuivre Tradition Copper Frypan, 11"

This pan’s bowl-like shape, with high sides and a small cooking surface, made it feel cramped compared with other skillets we tested, but it was just big enough to hold a full batch of macaroni and cheese or two chicken breasts. Food browned nicely. The pan’s slightly textured surface was a bit harder to scrub clean than others, and three raised rivets trapped food.

Model Number: 6465.28

Style: Steel lined

Pan Thickness: 2 mm

Construction: Copper; 0.2-mm stainless-steel lining

Copper Layer Thickness: 1.8 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 7⅞ in

Handle: Cast iron

Induction Compatible: No

Weight: 3 lb, 15 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $399.95

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

This pan’s bowl-like shape, with high sides and a small cooking surface, made it feel cramped compared with other skillets we tested, but it was just big enough to hold a full batch of macaroni and cheese or two chicken breasts. Food browned nicely. The pan’s slightly textured surface was a bit harder to scrub clean than others, and three raised rivets trapped food.

Model Number: 6465.28

Style: Steel lined

Pan Thickness: 2 mm

Construction: Copper; 0.2-mm stainless-steel lining

Copper Layer Thickness: 1.8 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 7⅞ in

Handle: Cast iron

Induction Compatible: No

Weight: 3 lb, 15 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $399.95

Recommended with Reservations

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

Kila Chef Tri-Ply Copper Bottom Frying Pan

This thick 11-inch pan felt both solid and quite heavy. It was slower to heat than other pans in the lineup, but once it was hot, it began browning a bit too fast, leaving the breading on our chicken breasts somewhat tough and dry. Otherwise, it cooked food well and fairly evenly. Its chunky, shiny stainless-steel handle mostly stayed cool on the stovetop, but its too-smooth texture made it slide in our hand when we were holding it up to scrape out browned butter. The pan’s bowl-like shape and high sides made it slightly awkward when reaching under food with a spatula.

Model Number: Fry2805

Style: Steel lined

Pan Thickness: 3.5 mm

Construction: 3-ply: 1.5-mm copper exterior, 1.5-mm aluminum core, 0.5-mm stainless-steel linin

Copper Layer Thickness: 1.5 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 8½ in

Handle: Stainless steel

Induction Compatible: No

Weight: 4 lb, 5 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $99.95

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use

This thick 11-inch pan felt both solid and quite heavy. It was slower to heat than other pans in the lineup, but once it was hot, it began browning a bit too fast, leaving the breading on our chicken breasts somewhat tough and dry. Otherwise, it cooked food well and fairly evenly. Its chunky, shiny stainless-steel handle mostly stayed cool on the stovetop, but its too-smooth texture made it slide in our hand when we were holding it up to scrape out browned butter. The pan’s bowl-like shape and high sides made it slightly awkward when reaching under food with a spatula.

Model Number: Fry2805

Style: Steel lined

Pan Thickness: 3.5 mm

Construction: 3-ply: 1.5-mm copper exterior, 1.5-mm aluminum core, 0.5-mm stainless-steel linin

Copper Layer Thickness: 1.5 mm

Cooking Surface Diameter: 8½ in

Handle: Stainless steel

Induction Compatible: No

Weight: 4 lb, 5 oz

Price at Time of Testing: $99.95

America's Test Kitchen Accolades Badge

Reviews You Can Trust

The mission of America’s Test Kitchen Reviews is to find the best equipment and ingredients for the home cook through rigorous, hands-on testing. We stand behind our winners so much that we even put our seal of approval on them. Have a question or suggestion? Send us an email at atkreviews@americastestkitchen.com. We appreciate your feedback!

The Expert

Author: Lisa McManus

Lisa McManus

Executive Editor, ATK Reviews

Lisa is an executive editor for ATK Reviews, cohost of Gear Heads on YouTube, and gadget expert on TV's America's Test Kitchen.

Lisa McManus is an executive editor for ATK Reviews, host of The Taste Test and cohost of Gear Heads on YouTube, and a cast member on TV's America's Test Kitchen. A passionate home cook, sometime waitress, and longtime journalist, she graduated from Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism and worked at magazines and newspapers in New York and California before returning like a homing pigeon to New England. In 2006 she got her dream job at ATK reviewing kitchen equipment and ingredients and has been pretty thrilled about it ever since. Her favorite thing is to go somewhere new and find something good to eat.

Appears In

This item is featured in the following. Click the links to dig in!

*All products reviewed by America’s Test Kitchen are independently chosen, researched, and reviewed by our editors. We buy products for testing at retail locations and do not accept unsolicited samples for testing. We list suggested sources for recommended products as a convenience to our readers but do not endorse specific retailers. When you choose to purchase our editorial recommendations from the links we provide, we may earn an affiliate commission. Prices are subject to change.

Reviews You Can Trust.
See Why.

This is a members' feature.
America's Test Kitchen LogoCook's Country LogoCook's Illustrated Logo