America's Test Kitchen LogoCook's Country LogoCook's Illustrated Logo

Reviews You Can Trust.
See Why.

Dry Storage Containers

These plastic or glass containers promise to keep your ingredients fresh and your pantry organized. We tested to find out which ones work best.

Headshot of Valerie Sizhe Li
By Valerie Sizhe Li

Last Updated July 14, 2026

What You Need to Know

We rely on dry storage containers to keep our pantry ingredients fresh and organized. Our favorite, the Cambro CamSquares Classic 6-Qt. Translucent Food Storage Container, is a mainstay of professional kitchens. This simple container seals tightly to protect dry goods and is easy to use and clean. We were also impressed with the Progressive ProKeeper+ 4-Qt. Flour Storage Container, a rectangular container designed for home use. It’s a good option for people who plan to keep their dry goods on their countertop and want a more attractive storage set.

We use dry storage containers for pantry ingredients such as flour, sugar, oats, pasta, rice, lentils, and other grains. These containers are more durable and seal more tightly than the bags or boxes these items come in, offering better protection from humidity and pests. They’re often sold in a variety of sizes, so you can assemble a set of matching containers that fit your needs.

Most of those containers are made of plastic. Much like how it is with plastic food storage containers used to transport lunch or store leftovers, different types of plastic are used to manufacture these sets. Polycarbonate previously was the most widely used type, in large part because it’s transparent and people can easily see inside containers made from it. Polycarbonate has become less common due to concerns that the bisphenol A (BPA) it contains can cause disruptions in hormonal activity if the plastic degrades. Plastic is more likely to degrade when exposed to heat, fat, and acids, and dry storage containers tend to be used in the pantry (away from bright light) and at room temperature (away from heat) with ingredients that are neither fatty nor acidic. Some companies—including Cambro, maker of containers that are ubiquitous in the restaurant industry—continue to produce and sell polycarbonate containers. (Note that we recommend washing all plastic containers by hand to avoid exposure to the long, hot wash and dry cycles in the dishwasher.) However, some manufacturers have switched to BPA-free plastics. The most common of these are polypropylene, which is translucent, and a clear-as-glass plastic sold under the brand name Tritan.

 A person pours a box of dried pasta into a food storage container.
We noted how easy it was to pour ingredients into and transfer them out of each container.

As with other categories of kitchen equipment, we’ve seen growing interest in glass options. We were intrigued by glass, which seemed to offer good looks—an important consideration in kitchens where the containers are visible—and doesn’t have the potential health concerns of some types of plastic. Options are currently limited and fairly expensive, but we found two sets to test. We imagine that this category will continue to grow over time.

What Size Dry Storage Containers Do You Need?

We focused our testing on 6-quart containers or, if a manufacturer didn’t offer that size, the closest available option. We knew from previous testing that 6-quart containers can comfortably fit a standard 5-pound bag of flour—an essential in most kitchens—and to dip in a measuring cup and level it off without spilling.

From the left: a 1-quart container with cereal, a 2-quart container with oats, a 3-quart container with sugar, and a 6-quart container with flour.
Most manufacturers offer a variety of sizes, allowing you to assemble a set that’s ideal for the ingredients you use most.

We suggest assembling a set of dry storage containers based on your specific pantry staples. Here are our recommendations for which size container to use for some common ingredients: 

  • 6-quart: 5-lb bags of flour or rice
  • 3-quart: 4-lb bag of sugar
  • 2-quart: 2-lb bag of rice or brown sugar, 2.6-lb package of oats
  • 1-quart: 1-lb bag of rice or brown sugar, 24-oz box of cereal

What to Look for

  • A Tight Seal: Humid air can ruin dry goods quickly. To find out which containers were most effective at keeping moisture at bay, we set up a closet with a humidifier running at 100 percent and performed a pair of tests—first when the containers were brand-new, and then again after they had gone through testing and had been opened and closed repeatedly. We added equal amounts of blue desiccant pebbles, which change color when exposed to humidity, to each container and then sealed them tight before placing them in the humid closet. We also included one open, lidless container as a control sample. Some containers’ desiccant pebbles remained sapphire blue, indicating that their lids kept out moisture and would provide a tightly sealed environment for dry goods. Pebbles in other containers started to fade, turning various shades of light purple to pink-ish purple, indicating that these containers were less tightly sealed. Interestingly, the style of lid didn’t correspond to how well it sealed: Some containers had lids that you simply pressed onto the container, while others latched or twisted closed. But even some simple press-down lids without any special latches or gaskets sealed tightly.
On the top shelf, a handful of dry storage containers with blue pebbles stored inside. On the bottom shelf, a humidifier.
We set up a controlled test in a small space using color-changing desiccant pebbles and a humidifier, noting whether the containers’ seals protected the pebbles from the extra-high humidity.
  • A Wide Opening: It’s easy to pour 5-pound bags of flour or big bags of sugar into containers with broad openings without spilling. Wide openings are helpful when using the containers too. We often dip dry measuring cups into storage containers and level them off with a knife (though many say that the most accurate way to measure dry ingredients without a digital scale is to spoon the flour into the measuring cup and then level). We found that openings measuring at least 8 inches wide gave our measuring cup enough clearance on both sides, so excess flour we swept off didn’t make a dusty mess on the counter.
  • Short Walls: To comfortably scoop ingredients without having to reach deep into a container, we liked short models with walls of 8.5 inches or less. One model was about 13 inches tall, so we were up to our elbows when we reached into the bottom of it to scoop flour.
A short, wider container with a red lid sits next to a taller, narrower container with a white and gray lid.
We preferred containers with short walls (left) because we didn’t have to dig deep into the container to empty it.
  • Clear Markings: Containers with measurement markings on the walls allowed us to tell at a glance how much flour, sugar, or oats we had on hand.
A container with a red lid and big, legible markings for liters and quarts.
On containers with clear markings, we can easily note how much is left inside.

What to Avoid

  • A Narrow Opening: A few containers we tested had narrow openings that were only about 4 inches across. Filling containers with such a tight opening was messy. Despite our best efforts to work slowly and carefully, flour flew sideways and landed on the counter, wasting it and making a mess that we had to clean up. Narrow openings also made it harder to scoop out ingredients.
A person dips a measuring cup into a wide container of flour and levels it with a knife. A person is demonstrating levels a measuring scoop of flour over a narrow container, spilling on the counter.

Containers with a wide opening allowed us to “dip and sweep” without making a mess.

  • Narrow Containers: It felt cramped and awkward to access the lower portion of narrow containers. Some had big indentations that further narrowed the available space, making it very challenging to scoop out ingredients with a measuring cup.

Other Considerations

  • Maneuverability: Almost all of the plastic containers had indentations that acted like handles, allowing you to lift and carry them more easily. The plastic models were also fairly light. None of the glass containers had handles and we found the glass to be a little more slippery. They also weighed about 1 pound more than the plastic models, a difference that felt very noticeable when the containers were filled with 5 pounds of flour. That said, we don’t consider these issues to be deal-breakers for someone who really wants to avoid plastic. 

  • Place color-changing desiccant pebbles inside sealed container, then store in a high-humidity environment for five days, checking for signs of moisture  
  • Fill with 5-pound bag of flour 
  • Using 1-cup dry measuring cup, transfer contents into mixing bowl until empty
  • For plastic: Fill with a 5-pound bag of flour, close tightly, then drop onto floor from a height of about 2 feet 
  • For glass: Fill with a 5-pound bag of flour, close tightly, then gently knock over onto the counter
  • Open and close lid 100 times
  • Wash and dry each container 10 times by hand
  • Repeat test with color-changing desiccant pebbles at conclusion of other evaluations

How We Rated 

  • Performance: We evaluated whether the containers sealed tightly and kept out humidity. 
  • Ease of Use: We rated how easy it was to dispense ingredients. We also assessed how easily each container could be lifted and moved around a kitchen.
  • Cleanup: We noted how easy it was to clean and dry each container.

Everything We Tested

Good 3 Stars out of 3.
Fair 2 Stars out of 3.
Poor 1 Star out of 3.

Highly Recommended

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

Co-WinnerCambro CamSquares Classic 6-Qt. Translucent Food Storage Container

Cambro containers are ubiquitous in restaurants, and we like these simple plastic containers for storing pantry items at home too. They’re sturdy and they seal tightly. In our tests, color-changing desiccant pebbles remained sapphire blue after 10 days, indicating that humid air didn’t enter. The wide opening of this container allowed us to dip dry measuring cups in and level their contents without worrying about spilling. It easily fits a whole 5-pound bag of flour, with room to spare. The container was easy to lift and move, thanks to a wide lip around the opening that acted as a sort of handle. The lids are sold separately—a lingering quirk that can be traced back to their origin as a food service product for professional kitchens—and we wish it was possible to buy a lid and container as a 2-piece set. Because the lids are flat with a raised border, we could stack the containers securely and make the most out of limited space.

Model Number: 6SFSPP190

Weight: 1 lb, 0.1 oz

Material: Polypropylene

Dimensions: 8.6 x 8.6 x 6.9 in

Available Sizes: 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 22 qt

Price at Time of Testing: $26

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

Cambro containers are ubiquitous in restaurants, and we like these simple plastic containers for storing pantry items at home too. They’re sturdy and they seal tightly. In our tests, color-changing desiccant pebbles remained sapphire blue after 10 days, indicating that humid air didn’t enter. The wide opening of this container allowed us to dip dry measuring cups in and level their contents without worrying about spilling. It easily fits a whole 5-pound bag of flour, with room to spare. The container was easy to lift and move, thanks to a wide lip around the opening that acted as a sort of handle. The lids are sold separately—a lingering quirk that can be traced back to their origin as a food service product for professional kitchens—and we wish it was possible to buy a lid and container as a 2-piece set. Because the lids are flat with a raised border, we could stack the containers securely and make the most out of limited space.

Model Number: 6SFSPP190

Weight: 1 lb, 0.1 oz

Material: Polypropylene

Dimensions: 8.6 x 8.6 x 6.9 in

Available Sizes: 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 22 qt

Price at Time of Testing: $26

Recommended

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

Co-WinnerProgressive ProKeeper+ 4-Qt Flour Storage Container

We liked this container’s attractive design and appreciated that the contoured body allowed us to grip it securely when moving it around. The 4-quart model had the largest capacity in this line; though it held 5 pounds of flour with a little room to spare, you probably can’t fit much more than that if buying from this series. The lid has a gasket and latches closed, and we were impressed that it was the only container in our lineup that stayed tightly sealed when it was dropped 1.5 feet. Its tight seal kept moisture out; in a test with color-changing desiccant pebbles, they stayed blue. The container includes a small rectangular leveler. It can be clipped to the underside of the lid (it’s magnetic) or slid into grooves on the container that set it at just the right angle for leveling off a dry measuring cup. Our minor quibble was that the latch and the gasket trapped flour and made the container a bit hard to clean, especially because the lid is hinged and cannot be removed for cleanup. It’s a small annoyance given that dry storage containers do not need to be washed very frequently.

Model Number: n/a

Weight: 1 lb, 3.2 oz

Material: BPA-free plastic

Dimensions: 8 x 6.5 x 8.5 in

Available Sizes: 0.42, 1.55, 2, 2.4, and 4 qt

Price at Time of Testing: $57 (set of 2)

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

We liked this container’s attractive design and appreciated that the contoured body allowed us to grip it securely when moving it around. The 4-quart model had the largest capacity in this line; though it held 5 pounds of flour with a little room to spare, you probably can’t fit much more than that if buying from this series. The lid has a gasket and latches closed, and we were impressed that it was the only container in our lineup that stayed tightly sealed when it was dropped 1.5 feet. Its tight seal kept moisture out; in a test with color-changing desiccant pebbles, they stayed blue. The container includes a small rectangular leveler. It can be clipped to the underside of the lid (it’s magnetic) or slid into grooves on the container that set it at just the right angle for leveling off a dry measuring cup. Our minor quibble was that the latch and the gasket trapped flour and made the container a bit hard to clean, especially because the lid is hinged and cannot be removed for cleanup. It’s a small annoyance given that dry storage containers do not need to be washed very frequently.

Model Number: n/a

Weight: 1 lb, 3.2 oz

Material: BPA-free plastic

Dimensions: 8 x 6.5 x 8.5 in

Available Sizes: 0.42, 1.55, 2, 2.4, and 4 qt

Price at Time of Testing: $57 (set of 2)

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

Cambro FreshPro Camwear 6 Qt. Food Storage Container

This container was easy to hold and move around, thanks to recessed handles on two sides. It comfortably accommodated a 5-pound bag of flour with plenty of room to spare. The wide opening made it easy for us to scoop flour. As with the other Cambro product we tested, the lids are sold separately. The lids were effective at fending off moisture and the desiccant pebbles remained blue. The recessed sides curved inward, resulting in less usable space compared to other models we tested. The recessed design also created tight corners that were difficult for our measuring cup to reach into, and to clean. 

Model Number: 6SFSPROCW135

Weight: 1 lb, 4.2 oz

Material: Polycarbonate

Dimensions: 9 x 9 x 7.125 in

Available Sizes: 2, 4, 6, and 8 qt

Price at Time of Testing: $22

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

This container was easy to hold and move around, thanks to recessed handles on two sides. It comfortably accommodated a 5-pound bag of flour with plenty of room to spare. The wide opening made it easy for us to scoop flour. As with the other Cambro product we tested, the lids are sold separately. The lids were effective at fending off moisture and the desiccant pebbles remained blue. The recessed sides curved inward, resulting in less usable space compared to other models we tested. The recessed design also created tight corners that were difficult for our measuring cup to reach into, and to clean. 

Model Number: 6SFSPROCW135

Weight: 1 lb, 4.2 oz

Material: Polycarbonate

Dimensions: 9 x 9 x 7.125 in

Available Sizes: 2, 4, 6, and 8 qt

Price at Time of Testing: $22

Recommended with Reservations

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

Rubbermaid Brilliance Airtight Cereal Food Storage Container, 4.5 Qt

This tall, narrow dry storage container belongs to the same product line as our favorite glass and plastic food storage containers, which feature a lid with latches and gaskets. This particular model has two latched openings on its lid, one of which is designed for easily dispensing cereal. We included it in our evaluations because it’s the only option in the product line that is large enough to fit a 5-pound bag of flour comfortably. The gasket on the lid and the two latches formed a tight seal during our tests in a humid enclosed space. But the lid popped off when we knocked it over, and flour spilled. The container was narrow, making it more difficult to fill than wider containers. It also didn’t allow enough clearance space for the excess flour to fall back into the container when we swept the measuring cup with a knife and made a mess on the counter. The additional latches and the gasket also trapped flour and had to be brushed off when we used the container, and they were a bit of a pain to clean. 

Model Number: 2146788

Weight: 1 lb, 7.4 oz

Material: Tritan, silicone gasket

Dimensions: 10.25 x 4.75 x 9.38 in

Available Sizes: 7.8, 12, 16, and 18 cups (1.95, 3, 4, and 4.5 qt)

Price at Time of Testing: $14.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

This tall, narrow dry storage container belongs to the same product line as our favorite glass and plastic food storage containers, which feature a lid with latches and gaskets. This particular model has two latched openings on its lid, one of which is designed for easily dispensing cereal. We included it in our evaluations because it’s the only option in the product line that is large enough to fit a 5-pound bag of flour comfortably. The gasket on the lid and the two latches formed a tight seal during our tests in a humid enclosed space. But the lid popped off when we knocked it over, and flour spilled. The container was narrow, making it more difficult to fill than wider containers. It also didn’t allow enough clearance space for the excess flour to fall back into the container when we swept the measuring cup with a knife and made a mess on the counter. The additional latches and the gasket also trapped flour and had to be brushed off when we used the container, and they were a bit of a pain to clean. 

Model Number: 2146788

Weight: 1 lb, 7.4 oz

Material: Tritan, silicone gasket

Dimensions: 10.25 x 4.75 x 9.38 in

Available Sizes: 7.8, 12, 16, and 18 cups (1.95, 3, 4, and 4.5 qt)

Price at Time of Testing: $14.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

OXO Good Grips POP Container Big Square Tall 6 Qt

This container was one of the few we tested that can be opened with one hand; you push the pop-up button and then lift the lid by grabbing the button. The lid kept a tight seal and didn’t let in any moisture. The lid consists of two plastic parts and a rubber gasket sandwiched in between, all of which comes apart for cleaning. Although we don’t wash dry storage containers as often as some other pieces of equipment in our kitchen, it was annoying to wash and dry so many parts separately. While we appreciated the moderate width of the opening, the container was very tall and narrow; it was uncomfortably deep for some of our testers to reach their arms into when it was almost empty. It was also less stable on the counter than wider, more squat containers and not easily stackable. When we dropped the container, the lid popped off every single time.

Model Number: 11233400

Weight: 1 lb, 3.9 oz

Material: Tritan, with plastic lid and silicone gasket

Dimensions: 6.3 x 6.3 x 13.1 in

Available Sizes: 0.4, 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 2.2, 2.7, 2.8, 4.4, 6 qt, and more

Price at Time of Testing: $22.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

This container was one of the few we tested that can be opened with one hand; you push the pop-up button and then lift the lid by grabbing the button. The lid kept a tight seal and didn’t let in any moisture. The lid consists of two plastic parts and a rubber gasket sandwiched in between, all of which comes apart for cleaning. Although we don’t wash dry storage containers as often as some other pieces of equipment in our kitchen, it was annoying to wash and dry so many parts separately. While we appreciated the moderate width of the opening, the container was very tall and narrow; it was uncomfortably deep for some of our testers to reach their arms into when it was almost empty. It was also less stable on the counter than wider, more squat containers and not easily stackable. When we dropped the container, the lid popped off every single time.

Model Number: 11233400

Weight: 1 lb, 3.9 oz

Material: Tritan, with plastic lid and silicone gasket

Dimensions: 6.3 x 6.3 x 13.1 in

Available Sizes: 0.4, 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 2.2, 2.7, 2.8, 4.4, 6 qt, and more

Price at Time of Testing: $22.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

Caraway Large Glass Airtight Container, 4 qt

This glass container was expensive. Its plastic lid has a removable gasket and an air vent that, when closed, creates an airtight seal; the desiccant pebbles were still blue after 10 days in a humidity-controlled space. We liked its relatively small footprint on the counter, but the container barely fit a 5-pound bag of flour. When we tried to shut the lid when it was full, puffs of flour came out of its air vent and made a mess. Washing this container was tricky too: It was slippery and we were afraid that we would drop and break it. We also didn’t like the tall, narrow shape, which was harder to scoop from and was uncomfortable to clean.

Model Number: n/a

Weight: 2 lb, 6 oz

Material: Glass, with plastic lid and silicone gasket

Dimensions: 6 x 6 x 9 in

Available Sizes: 1, 2.5, and 4 qt

Price at Time of Testing: $52

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

This glass container was expensive. Its plastic lid has a removable gasket and an air vent that, when closed, creates an airtight seal; the desiccant pebbles were still blue after 10 days in a humidity-controlled space. We liked its relatively small footprint on the counter, but the container barely fit a 5-pound bag of flour. When we tried to shut the lid when it was full, puffs of flour came out of its air vent and made a mess. Washing this container was tricky too: It was slippery and we were afraid that we would drop and break it. We also didn’t like the tall, narrow shape, which was harder to scoop from and was uncomfortable to clean.

Model Number: n/a

Weight: 2 lb, 6 oz

Material: Glass, with plastic lid and silicone gasket

Dimensions: 6 x 6 x 9 in

Available Sizes: 1, 2.5, and 4 qt

Price at Time of Testing: $52

Not Recommended

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

Anchor Hocking 1 Gallon Glass Cracker Jar with Brushed Metal Lid

This glass container had a screw-on lid much like a Mason jar; it formed a tight seal and kept the contents inside perfectly dry even in a very high-humidity environment. The container had one of the narrowest openings of any we tested—only 4.25 inches wide—and we could barely fit a dry measuring cup through the neck of the jar. To fill and to scoop, we had to carefully angle the measuring cup so it didn’t get stuck in the opening. Because of that, we made a mess trying to scoop flour and level it with a knife; the flour flew everywhere. The small, round lid also made stacking impossible.

Model Number: n/a

Weight: 2.5 lb

Material: Glass, metal (lid)

Dimensions: 6.625 x 6.625 x 8.25 in

Available Sizes: 2 qt, 1 gallon (4 qt)

Price at Time of Testing: $38.99 for a set of four ($9.75 each)

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cleanup

This glass container had a screw-on lid much like a Mason jar; it formed a tight seal and kept the contents inside perfectly dry even in a very high-humidity environment. The container had one of the narrowest openings of any we tested—only 4.25 inches wide—and we could barely fit a dry measuring cup through the neck of the jar. To fill and to scoop, we had to carefully angle the measuring cup so it didn’t get stuck in the opening. Because of that, we made a mess trying to scoop flour and level it with a knife; the flour flew everywhere. The small, round lid also made stacking impossible.

Model Number: n/a

Weight: 2.5 lb

Material: Glass, metal (lid)

Dimensions: 6.625 x 6.625 x 8.25 in

Available Sizes: 2 qt, 1 gallon (4 qt)

Price at Time of Testing: $38.99 for a set of four ($9.75 each)

America's Test Kitchen Accolades Badge

Reviews You Can Trust

The mission of America’s Test Kitchen Reviews is to find the best equipment and ingredients for the home cook through rigorous, hands-on testing. We stand behind our winners so much that we even put our seal of approval on them. Have a question or suggestion? Send us an email at atkreviews@americastestkitchen.com. We appreciate your feedback!

The Expert

Author: Valerie Sizhe Li

Valerie Sizhe Li

Associate Editor, ATK Reviews

Valerie is an associate editor for ATK Reviews. She has many passions, including skiing, running, playing the flute, and spending time outdoors.

Valerie Li Stack is an associate editor for ATK Reviews. Having grown up in a family that traveled extensively, she’s visited more than 50 countries—with more to come. Thanks to these travel experiences and the ability to converse in multiple languages, she’s always learning about regional cuisines around the world. She's a flutist in a 10-piece band called Quahog Wild and occasionally runs marathons. But her biggest passion is skiing, a hobby that she picked up in her adult life. Her stories have appeared in multiple publications, including Eater, USA Today, and more.

Appears In

This item is featured in the following. Click the links to dig in!

*All products reviewed by America’s Test Kitchen are independently chosen, researched, and reviewed by our editors. We buy products for testing at retail locations and do not accept unsolicited samples for testing. We list suggested sources for recommended products as a convenience to our readers but do not endorse specific retailers. When you choose to purchase our editorial recommendations from the links we provide, we may earn an affiliate commission. Prices are subject to change.

Reviews You Can Trust.
See Why.

This is a members' feature.
America's Test Kitchen LogoCook's Country LogoCook's Illustrated Logo