America's Test Kitchen LogoCook's Country LogoCook's Illustrated Logo

Reviews You Can Trust.
See Why.

Robot Vacuums

Today’s robot vacuums promise to map your home, vacuum and mop your floors, avoid pet “accidents,” empty their own bins, do video surveillance, and clean specific rooms following elaborate schedules. Do any of these functions work?

Headshot of Lisa McManus
By Lisa McManus

Last Updated June 24, 2025

What You Need To Know

When we're done cooking for the night, our kitchen floors can probably tell you just what we made for dinner. And the last thing most of us want to do is break out the broom or vacuum. Enter robot vacuums, which promise to take care of all that mess for you. We tested the latest robot vacuum cleaners at a wide range of prices. They offer special features that include voice and app control, mop attachments, home mapping, scheduled cleaning, pet-accident avoidance, video surveillance, and more. Our top choices are based on sheer cleaning power: They did the best job at removing dirt. They were also easy to operate, whether we used controls on the robots or their user-friendly apps. The iRobot Roomba j7+ Robot Vacuum was the premier picker-upper, easily “sweeping” the competition. It can keep going to get any job done since it empties its own dustbin, recharges, and returns to cleaning. It quickly created an accurate map that let us label rooms and set up scheduled or impromptu cleaning of designated areas or of the whole house. The Shark ION Robot Vacuum, a more budget-friendly robot with simpler features that performed nearly as well in picking up dirt as our winner, is a great option and our Best Buy.

winning attributes of a good robot vacuum

The earliest robot vacuum, the hockey puck–shaped iRobot Roomba, appeared in 2002. Since then, the category has grown and evolved as more manufacturers have explored different robot shapes and features. The earliest models navigated by bouncing off walls and furniture as they traveled randomly around each room. Today, many robots can map your home with lasers or optical sensors and follow methodical cleaning patterns. The newest models offer many bells and whistles at a wide range of prices. We first focused on their vacuuming abilities and then decided which extras were worthwhile.

We scattered the same carefully weighed kitchen mess of flour, coffee grounds, and other ingredients in a pen; set each robot to work; and then measured what each picked up. The best models picked up nearly 100 percent of the mixture, while the worst left most of it behind.

What to Look For

  • Cleaning Power: In our lab tests, robots were presented with equal amounts of kitchen mess that included used coffee grounds, popcorn kernels, onion peels, salt, flour, and minced vegetables. The best robot picked up 100 percent of the mess; the worst, just 59 percent. Next we scattered rainbow confectionery sprinkles on a floor with an area rug. The best model scooped up more than 98 percent of the sprinkles; the worst, just 36 percent. Powerful suction made a big difference: As they passed over dirt, the top two models left clear trails, unlike lower-ranked models. Our favorite, by iRobot, also had unique dual counter-rotating rubber brushes that rigorously scooped up debris.

Powerful suction made a big difference. Robots were presented with equal amounts of kitchen mess that included used coffee grounds, popcorn kernels, onion peels, salt, flour, and minced vegetables. The best robot picked up 100 percent of the mess; the worst, just 59 percent. Next we scattered rainbow confectionery sprinkles on a floor with an area rug. The best model scooped up more than 98 percent of the sprinkles; the worst, just 36 percent.

  • Thorough Coverage: We liked robots that didn’t miss spots. A few used supposedly sophisticated lidar navigation technology, while some followed preset patterns—and one navigated randomly like an early Roomba. But not all of these movement modes actually sent the vacuum over the whole floor, as we saw in time-lapse photos (and in the results of our lab-vacuuming tests). An inexpensive, simple model by Shark that randomly bumped around a room still covered it more thoroughly than many fancier models. On the other end of the spectrum, our top model, by iRobot, used a complex combination of navigation modes, including a camera that creates digital “waypoints” to navigate and map its position in the room, built-in movement patterns, and internal and external sensors that constantly detect its position (as well as extra dirt, cliffs, and obstacles) so that it can traverse any space thoroughly.

Although our Best Buy vacuum, the Shark ION (left), operates by randomly traversing a room, it thoroughly covered the space, as evidenced by our time-lapse photo. Our winner, the iRobot Roomba j7+ (right), uses intelligent navigation, multiple sensors, and patterned movements to travel around a room and completely clean it.

  • Fast, Accurate Mapping: Some robots offer a mapping feature. As it first travels through your space, the robot begins to create a map visible on its app that lets you designate and schedule areas for cleaning. But some robots’ maps were still incomplete and inaccurate long after others’ maps were finished to the point that we could create cleaning schedules—or simply send the robot to vacuum only the kitchen floor.
  • Easy to Operate: Our favorite models were simple to use and easy to set up, with clear controls on the robots and their apps; dustbins that emptied automatically or without making us struggle to get dirt out; strong connections to Wi-Fi; and well-designed, compact parts and accessories.

1. Our winner from iRobot quickly mapped multiple rooms accurately and showed them on its app. We could label rooms, set cleaning schedules, and send the robot to clean everywhere or to specific rooms or areas at designated times. 2. The Bissell app was easy to use and gave us clear indications of what was happening with the robot; not all apps were as user-friendly. 3. The Trifo Lucy Pet Edition includes a survellance camera that you can turn on from the app to view or record what the robot is seeing. We found its low camera angle not very useful and the function a bit creepy.

Pro Tip: We found that a dustpan brush, with its soft, flexible bristles and narrow head, is an excellent tool for dislodging dust clinging to the plastic walls and paper filters when emptying the dirt-collection bins on robot vacuums.
  • Clear Messaging: Many of the robots we tested actually “spoke” to us; we liked the models that clearly communicated via an app or a voice, telling us when to empty dustbins, when they needed help getting unstuck, or when they needed a repair. For those that didn’t speak, app notifications and visual cues on the robot itself were helpful.
  • Simple, Sturdy Charging Docks: Every robot comes with a “dock” that plugs into an electrical outlet where the robot can recharge its batteries. We preferred models with compact, sturdy charging docks that were easy to assemble and designed for secure, unambiguous docking.

What to Avoid

  • Weak Suction: If the robot vacuum doesn’t clean thoroughly, it’s not doing you any favors. In lab tests we watched some models run right over sprinkles or food scraps and leave a significant percentage behind. While a few models let you adjust suction power via their apps, the “max” setting depleted batteries.
  • Confusing Controls and/or Apps: Even if a robot vacuum has exciting features, if its app and display are hard to interpret or use, you’ll be fighting it instead of relaxing while it cleans. In addition, some robots had no trouble finding and connecting to our Wi-Fi, while others struggled, frequently made us wait, and sometimes lost connection altogether.

The D-shaped Neato vacuum often got stuck, including on raised thresholds, and asked for help.

  • Lost Travelers: Some robots frequently got stuck and called for help or couldn’t locate their own recharging docks. One robot sat in an open hallway and plaintively repeated that it had become “disoriented.” Another kept stalling on thresholds. A third rolled far under a claw-foot bathtub and then shut down.

This time-lapse photo shows the Neato robot vacuum's pattern of back-and-forth cleaning, but in our lab tests, it did a poor job of suctioning dirt, leaving trails of rubble in its wake.

  • Poor Cleaning Patterns: A few robots ran through rooms in an appealing back-and-forth pattern but still missed areas (and plenty of dirt). Following a grid wasn’t always more effective than random cleaning where the robot simply bounced off walls for an extended time. As our time-lapse photos and lab tests showed, if the robot followed a grid pattern that was too spread out, or its programmed movement pattern didn’t vary enough, it would miss strips or areas of the floor. Smart navigation systems that helped robots avoid bashing walls and furniture sometimes seemed too cautious, meaning dirt stayed along the walls.

The Bissell robot followed a pattern to clean the space but repeatedly missed a large area, as this time-lapse image shows.

  • Weak Work Ethic: A few robots decided they were finished and returned to their docks long before a space was clean. One often perkily declared, “I’ve done my chores!” after a few minutes of vacuuming and docked to recharge, even with a nearly full charge on its battery. Their sensors apparently failed to tell them they still had dirt to pick up. Others’ batteries depleted rapidly. While all robot vacuums use lithium ion batteries, not all robots operate equally efficiently to conserve the charges, and the batteries themselves can vary in quality.

The iRobot Roomba j7+ spotted and carefully avoided larger piles of fake poo but then ran right over a smaller one.

Other Considerations

  • Promised Features Didn’t Deliver: Dazzling claims didn’t always pan out: We found video surveillance (and recording) interesting but creepy, and what we could see was fairly limited given the robot’s-eye view a few inches above the floor. Robots that claimed to have extra suction to pick up pet hair didn’t necessarily perform better than those without this feature. We liked the idea of a mopping attachment (see our testing of robot mops) so that we could skip buying two separate devices, but on models with so-so vacuuming functions, we’d rather pass. Finally, two models promised to spot and swerve away from pet poo but failed. (For the full results, see “Don’t Hit the Poo.”)

Don’t Hit the Poo

Two robots in our lineup, the Trifo Lucy Pet Edition and the iRobot Roomba j7+ Robot Vacuum, promised to spot and swerve away from solid pet “accidents” on the floor. iRobot even guarantees it. For people whose pets sometimes make messes around the house, having a robot vacuum dutifully spread poo through every room is a nightmare. 

We ordered several all-too-realistic-looking assorted pieces of soft plastic pet poo online (an experience we never expected would be part of our jobs), scattered them around in hallways and rooms, and set each robot to work vacuuming the areas. 

Unfortunately, the Trifo Lucy Pet Edition failed outright, dragging poo around the floor at every encounter. The iRobot Roomba j7+ Robot Vacuum neatly avoided large piles, cleaning carefully around them, but plowed right into ones a smaller dog or a cat might make. The bottom line: Don’t rely on this feature.

Pictured below: The Trifo Lucy Pet Edition (left) failed to avoid poo; a piece of the soft, realistic-looking plastic poo got caught in the brushes underneath the robot. The iRobot Roomba j7+ (right) spotted and swerved away from the pet "accidents" but didn't notice a small pile that a cat or smaller dog might leave.

  • Set up the apps and connect the apps to the robots
  • Scatter a measured amount of mixed kitchen ingredients on a designated floor area of a lab and then weigh the amount of debris collected
  • Scatter a measured amount of confectionery sprinkles on an area rug and floor in a designated area of a lab and then weigh the amount of debris collected
  • Vacuum (and also mop, where applicable), using each robot in a home environment on a variety of floor surfaces and area rugs over several days
  • Where applicable, use maps of the home created by robots to clean designated areas and set schedules
  • Test additional features, if any

Everything We Tested

Good 3 Stars out of 3.
Fair 2 Stars out of 3.
Poor 1 Star out of 3.

Highly Recommended

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

WinneriRobot Roomba j7+ Robot Vacuum

This robot was outstanding at picking up nearly every last bit of the sample messes we scattered, partly due to its unique dual counter-rotating rubber brushes. We appreciated that it would periodically dock to recharge and empty its own bin (the dock holds replaceable vacuum cleaner bags) before returning to cleaning. It quickly mapped multiple rooms accurately, making it easy to set cleaning schedules and assign it to specific rooms on demand. Its app wasn’t always the most user-friendly, with some tasks taking multiple steps, but it was adequate. One caveat: While the manufacturer guarantees that this robot avoids pet “accidents,” it didn’t do so consistently: Sometimes it was remarkably clever in dodging the larger pieces of soft plastic dog poo we placed on the floor, but it plowed right over small ones. It did avoid electrical cords as promised. We liked that this robot can be set to start cleaning when it detects that you have left the house and stop when you return, using the location on your phone or by linking to other smart home features such as your door locks. You can also set it to be silent at specific times, such as while you have Zoom meetings or the baby naps.

Model Number: j755020

Major Features: Self-emptying bin, mapping, scheduled cleaning

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 100%

Sprinkles Pickup: 96.67%

Price at Time of Testing: $776.00

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

This robot was outstanding at picking up nearly every last bit of the sample messes we scattered, partly due to its unique dual counter-rotating rubber brushes. We appreciated that it would periodically dock to recharge and empty its own bin (the dock holds replaceable vacuum cleaner bags) before returning to cleaning. It quickly mapped multiple rooms accurately, making it easy to set cleaning schedules and assign it to specific rooms on demand. Its app wasn’t always the most user-friendly, with some tasks taking multiple steps, but it was adequate. One caveat: While the manufacturer guarantees that this robot avoids pet “accidents,” it didn’t do so consistently: Sometimes it was remarkably clever in dodging the larger pieces of soft plastic dog poo we placed on the floor, but it plowed right over small ones. It did avoid electrical cords as promised. We liked that this robot can be set to start cleaning when it detects that you have left the house and stop when you return, using the location on your phone or by linking to other smart home features such as your door locks. You can also set it to be silent at specific times, such as while you have Zoom meetings or the baby naps.

Model Number: j755020

Major Features: Self-emptying bin, mapping, scheduled cleaning

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 100%

Sprinkles Pickup: 96.67%

Price at Time of Testing: $776.00

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

Best BuyShark ION Robot Vacuum

This simple, comparatively inexpensive robot was unstoppable; it randomly travels around a space, bouncing off walls and furniture, so it ended up picking up much more dirt and covering the space more thoroughly than so-called “smarter” robots with fancier navigation systems. When we set it to clean, either via the app or by pushing a button on top of the robot, it typically ran more than 1½ hours at a time, chugging along while most other robots we were testing returned exhausted to their docks. It’s also easy to operate, clean out, and maintain. Its app is pretty basic but lets you schedule cleaning.

Model Number: RV761

Major Features: Scheduled cleaning, app and voice control

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 93.2%

Sprinkles Pickup: 98.33%

Price at Time of Testing: $199.00

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

This simple, comparatively inexpensive robot was unstoppable; it randomly travels around a space, bouncing off walls and furniture, so it ended up picking up much more dirt and covering the space more thoroughly than so-called “smarter” robots with fancier navigation systems. When we set it to clean, either via the app or by pushing a button on top of the robot, it typically ran more than 1½ hours at a time, chugging along while most other robots we were testing returned exhausted to their docks. It’s also easy to operate, clean out, and maintain. Its app is pretty basic but lets you schedule cleaning.

Model Number: RV761

Major Features: Scheduled cleaning, app and voice control

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 93.2%

Sprinkles Pickup: 98.33%

Price at Time of Testing: $199.00

Recommended with Reservations

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

Bissell SpinWave Robot

This snow-white robot was easy to set up and did an acceptable job picking up measured messes in the lab. However, at home it often missed spots and got stuck as it went on its row-by-row cleaning pattern. It struggled with an area rug, leaving it rumpled. On the plus side, its app was easy to use and gave a clear indication of what was happening with the robot. We liked its mop attachment, with dual rotating heads that gave a deeper scrub than robot mops that drag cleaning pads; we could set the scrubbing to three power levels. It mopped a room several times over the course of more than an hour, but it didn’t work well unless it was on the “max” setting. Later, when we wiped the floor with a white paper towel, it came up gray; dirty water doesn’t get picked up. This robot is best for maintenance of an already-clean setting and for those who don’t mind that it needs some hands-on help.

Model Number: 28599

Major Features: Mop, scheduled cleaning, app control

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 75.2%

Sprinkles Pickup: 96.67%

Price at Time of Testing: $299.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

This snow-white robot was easy to set up and did an acceptable job picking up measured messes in the lab. However, at home it often missed spots and got stuck as it went on its row-by-row cleaning pattern. It struggled with an area rug, leaving it rumpled. On the plus side, its app was easy to use and gave a clear indication of what was happening with the robot. We liked its mop attachment, with dual rotating heads that gave a deeper scrub than robot mops that drag cleaning pads; we could set the scrubbing to three power levels. It mopped a room several times over the course of more than an hour, but it didn’t work well unless it was on the “max” setting. Later, when we wiped the floor with a white paper towel, it came up gray; dirty water doesn’t get picked up. This robot is best for maintenance of an already-clean setting and for those who don’t mind that it needs some hands-on help.

Model Number: 28599

Major Features: Mop, scheduled cleaning, app control

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 75.2%

Sprinkles Pickup: 96.67%

Price at Time of Testing: $299.99

Not Recommended

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

ILIFE A10 Mopping Robotic Vacuum

This robot constantly speaks about what it’s doing. But mostly what you’ll hear is that “charging will start soon.” That’s because it frequently decides to recharge after only a few minutes of run time. Its flimsy two-piece dock sometimes doesn’t fit smoothly together and also needs abundant open space around it, or the robot struggles to dock successfully. It has a mapping function, but even after many runs, its map remained incomplete, and its app was frequently frustrating to use. It did an acceptable but not stellar job picking up our measured messes of kitchen ingredients and confectionery sprinkles in the lab. At home it jumped over thresholds and handled rugs with aplomb, but it got stuck navigating out of a bathroom and shut down deep under the clawfoot tub, making us hunt for it.

Model Number: A10 Mop

Major Features: Mopping, mapping and scheduled cleaning, adjustable suction and brush speed, manual navigation option, speaks to communicate

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 89.6%

Sprinkles Pickup: 76.67%

Price at Time of Testing: $369.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

This robot constantly speaks about what it’s doing. But mostly what you’ll hear is that “charging will start soon.” That’s because it frequently decides to recharge after only a few minutes of run time. Its flimsy two-piece dock sometimes doesn’t fit smoothly together and also needs abundant open space around it, or the robot struggles to dock successfully. It has a mapping function, but even after many runs, its map remained incomplete, and its app was frequently frustrating to use. It did an acceptable but not stellar job picking up our measured messes of kitchen ingredients and confectionery sprinkles in the lab. At home it jumped over thresholds and handled rugs with aplomb, but it got stuck navigating out of a bathroom and shut down deep under the clawfoot tub, making us hunt for it.

Model Number: A10 Mop

Major Features: Mopping, mapping and scheduled cleaning, adjustable suction and brush speed, manual navigation option, speaks to communicate

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 89.6%

Sprinkles Pickup: 76.67%

Price at Time of Testing: $369.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

Trifo Lucy Pet Edition

This shiny, gold-trimmed robot had a loud, perky voice and was constantly telling us what it was doing. Unfortunately what it was usually doing was announcing, “I’ve done my chores!” and going back to the docking station well before the space was actually clean (and with battery charge to spare). As a “pet edition,” it’s designed to pick up lots of shed fur and avoid pet “accidents,” but in practice it ran right over soft plastic poo piles during multiple tests and didn’t seem to pick up more hair than other robots in our lineup.

Model Number: Lucy-P

Major Features: Speaks to communicate, voice and app control, live video surveillance/recording

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 61.2%

Sprinkles Pickup: 66.67%

Price at Time of Testing: $740.87

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

This shiny, gold-trimmed robot had a loud, perky voice and was constantly telling us what it was doing. Unfortunately what it was usually doing was announcing, “I’ve done my chores!” and going back to the docking station well before the space was actually clean (and with battery charge to spare). As a “pet edition,” it’s designed to pick up lots of shed fur and avoid pet “accidents,” but in practice it ran right over soft plastic poo piles during multiple tests and didn’t seem to pick up more hair than other robots in our lineup.

Model Number: Lucy-P

Major Features: Speaks to communicate, voice and app control, live video surveillance/recording

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 61.2%

Sprinkles Pickup: 66.67%

Price at Time of Testing: $740.87

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

Neato D8 Intelligent Robot Vacuum

This handsome, D-shaped robot was remarkably easy to set up, and we loved its compact dock that included a slot to hold its brush-cleaning tool. But it wasn’t very smart: Even after the robot went over the floor plan of our home several times for extended periods, its map remained incomplete and hard to interpret, so we couldn’t use it for scheduled cleaning. It often struggled with climbing thresholds, couldn’t locate its base, and kept shutting down its vacuum to figure out its surroundings (or so it told us) and ask to be picked up. The D shape, designed to help it get closer to clean walls and corners, seemed to contribute to its getting stuck more easily in tight spaces, and our top-ranked round-shaped robots swept up dirt equally well or better, even along walls and in corners. In our lab tests with premeasured messes, it did a poor job of suctioning dirt, leaving trails of rubble in its wake. (Its boast of a bigger dustbin capacity was wasted.)

Model Number: D8

Major Features: Mapping, scheduling, app control, allergen filter

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 58.8%

Sprinkles Pickup: 36.37%

Price at Time of Testing: $399

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

This handsome, D-shaped robot was remarkably easy to set up, and we loved its compact dock that included a slot to hold its brush-cleaning tool. But it wasn’t very smart: Even after the robot went over the floor plan of our home several times for extended periods, its map remained incomplete and hard to interpret, so we couldn’t use it for scheduled cleaning. It often struggled with climbing thresholds, couldn’t locate its base, and kept shutting down its vacuum to figure out its surroundings (or so it told us) and ask to be picked up. The D shape, designed to help it get closer to clean walls and corners, seemed to contribute to its getting stuck more easily in tight spaces, and our top-ranked round-shaped robots swept up dirt equally well or better, even along walls and in corners. In our lab tests with premeasured messes, it did a poor job of suctioning dirt, leaving trails of rubble in its wake. (Its boast of a bigger dustbin capacity was wasted.)

Model Number: D8

Major Features: Mapping, scheduling, app control, allergen filter

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 58.8%

Sprinkles Pickup: 36.37%

Price at Time of Testing: $399

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

Shark AI VACMOP

With row-by-row navigation (plus laser vision to avoid obstacles), this vacuum mop picked up a moderate amount of our measured lab messes but missed certain areas over and over. At home, it easily climbed thresholds and scoped out the territory to create a good map; unfortunately, its performance went downhill shortly thereafter: It kept wanting to do an initial exploration run, never completed its “carpet detection” mapping even though we tried to make it go, and finally disconnected itself from Wi-Fi—and refused to reconnect. On the plus side, we were glad that we could operate it manually and that its mop attachment snapped right over the dustbin, which made it extra-simple to use; it did an acceptable job mopping the floor.

Model Number: RV2001WD

Major Features: Mop, mapping and scheduled cleaning, app and voice control

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 68%

Sprinkles Pickup: 86.67%

Price at Time of Testing: $379.99

  • Performance
  • Ease of Use
  • App Friendliness

With row-by-row navigation (plus laser vision to avoid obstacles), this vacuum mop picked up a moderate amount of our measured lab messes but missed certain areas over and over. At home, it easily climbed thresholds and scoped out the territory to create a good map; unfortunately, its performance went downhill shortly thereafter: It kept wanting to do an initial exploration run, never completed its “carpet detection” mapping even though we tried to make it go, and finally disconnected itself from Wi-Fi—and refused to reconnect. On the plus side, we were glad that we could operate it manually and that its mop attachment snapped right over the dustbin, which made it extra-simple to use; it did an acceptable job mopping the floor.

Model Number: RV2001WD

Major Features: Mop, mapping and scheduled cleaning, app and voice control

Kitchen Mess Pickup: 68%

Sprinkles Pickup: 86.67%

Price at Time of Testing: $379.99

America's Test Kitchen Accolades Badge

Reviews You Can Trust

The mission of America’s Test Kitchen Reviews is to find the best equipment and ingredients for the home cook through rigorous, hands-on testing. We stand behind our winners so much that we even put our seal of approval on them. Have a question or suggestion? Send us an email at atkreviews@americastestkitchen.com. We appreciate your feedback!

The Expert

Author: Lisa McManus

Lisa McManus

Executive Editor, ATK Reviews

Lisa is an executive editor for ATK Reviews, cohost of Gear Heads on YouTube, and gadget expert on TV's America's Test Kitchen.

Lisa McManus is an executive editor for ATK Reviews, host of The Taste Test and cohost of Gear Heads on YouTube, and a cast member on TV's America's Test Kitchen. A passionate home cook, sometime waitress, and longtime journalist, she graduated from Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism and worked at magazines and newspapers in New York and California before returning like a homing pigeon to New England. In 2006 she got her dream job at ATK reviewing kitchen equipment and ingredients and has been pretty thrilled about it ever since. Her favorite thing is to go somewhere new and find something good to eat.

Appears In

This item is featured in the following. Click the links to dig in!

*All products reviewed by America’s Test Kitchen are independently chosen, researched, and reviewed by our editors. We buy products for testing at retail locations and do not accept unsolicited samples for testing. We list suggested sources for recommended products as a convenience to our readers but do not endorse specific retailers. When you choose to purchase our editorial recommendations from the links we provide, we may earn an affiliate commission. Prices are subject to change.

Reviews You Can Trust.
See Why.

This is a members' feature.
America's Test Kitchen LogoCook's Country LogoCook's Illustrated Logo